Blogs > Stan's Blog

Talking about everything and anything that just doesn't sound right

Monday, October 22, 2012

Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are interviewing for the same job; who do you hire?

Have you ever been in a position to hire someone?

Over the years I’ve hired a lot of people, some I look back on with a smile, and some I look back on with a cringe, and a what the heck was I thinking.

We’ve recently had a few positions to fill, mostly due to promotions, so it’s a good thing.

A lot of you know John Berry, he was my online editor with the massive beard that seemed to be taking over his entire upper body. He was promoted to editor of a couple of papers in Connecticut. Ashley Campbell, recently named community engagement editor, was promoted to take John’s place.

So the newsroom shuffle resulted in an open entry level position.

Always a great opportunity. Every chance to hire someone should be taken seriously and entered into with eyes wide open.

There’s always that hire that turns out to be nothing like the person you interviewed.

Think about it. Someone trying to get their foot in the door of a company is going to put on their Sunday best and come prepared to dazzle.

When you’re the one doing the hiring, though, it’s your job to make sure you see through the spit and polish.

I’ve told people for years, if I have two candidates for the same position and one went to Harvard and the other went to Kutztown and the one from Harvard was completely arrogant and the one from Kutztown was down to earth and seemed like someone everyone in the newsroom would get along with, everything else being equal, I’d hire the kid from Kutztown.

Well, what would you do if one of the candidates already worked for you and was going up against someone from the outside?

Seems to me that kind of puts the person doing the hiring in the catbird seat now doesn’t it?

And that’s where we are today as we head into the final weeks before the presidential election.

One candidate has the job and wants to be rehired, and the other is coming in fresh, trying his best to make a good first impression.

While both candidates did indeed go to Harvard, I still have to hold true to my thought process on determining who would be the best candidate for the job.

We’ve had more than four years, counting the campaign leading to the last election, of President Obama telling us what we need, and the best way for us to get what we need.

I don’t know about you, but I just don’t think we’ve gotten anywhere near where he said he was going to get us, and I don’t think giving him four more years will get us any closer. I know he has that one month of unemployment dipping below eight percent to hang his hat on, but I don’t think anyone believes for a minute that the dip was a bellwether of great things to come.

And on top of it all, Obama seems to carry a little bit of arrogance with him as he tells us how and why and when we should be doing things to get ourselves back on the road to prosperity.

But at this point, I’m not even sure his own party is buying it.

While he does seem to be spending an inordinate amount of time hobnobbing with celebrities, he has at least attempted to accomplish some of his assigned duties, one of which is putting a budget up before Congress.

The problem is ... he couldn’t get anyone to vote for it. And I mean anyone. Not a single member of his own party would even give his proposal a vote of confidence, much less a vote on the floor, of either arm of our legislative body.

How is it possible that not one member of Congress saw fit to vote for his spending plan?

Perhaps it’s because he spends like a drunken sailor on leave? No offense to any drunken sailor anywhere by the way, because even drunken sailors only spend the money they have on them at the time. Obama is spending all the money he has on him, and all the money we have on us, too, and not just now, but all the money we might have on us in the future.

And I don’t know about you, but I haven’t heard much remorse in his voice during the past couple of debates about the fix he’s gotten us into. All I hear is about how much more we need to keep spending, and all of this coming on the heels of yet another company Obama gave millions to only to have them file for bankruptcy a short time after. First there was Solyndra, the solar panel company that received $535 million in loan guarantees, and then A123, a battery manufacturer that received $249.1 million. Since when did we authorize the federal government to go into the venture capital business?

So, we’re bringing the two candidates back in for their final interviews. Pay close attention. Both went to Harvard, but everything else here just doesn’t seem equal.

Which one do you hire?

24 Comments:

Blogger Ernie of Cherry St. said...

Stanley, I really respect you and know your politics. However, I have watched numerous hours of election coverage over the past few months and I don't see how folks cannot see Mr. Romney's game. He does reverse moves more often that a state champion wrestler. His last (3rd) debate performance was truly disrespectful to all Americans. To use the 'change' move and abandon his past views and behaviors, is in no way indicative of the behavior a presidential candidate should display. If we accept those antics, what should we expect his White House behaviors would be...

October 24, 2012 at 9:32 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. Romney does make some very fast moves and changes direction when our country has a problem or there is a problem some where else in the world causing a move. This is what a true leader is willing to do and accept the way our world is and any thing that needs to be done - discuss with other Countries and the UN - do what has to be done. We also need to stay out of personal affairs of our friends that makes any bar room fight or a local complaint a federal offense. Stop smoking in our White House and stop the governments financing of this industry and the farmers that grow the crops. Cancer is not a fun illness. Change is good for the right reason.

October 27, 2012 at 3:39 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I prefer to have a man/woman be our Commander-in-Chief that has earned his/her place in life and can support his/her way of life without Government's help. Too many helping hands covering our personal life has caused our citizens to believe that is a given and it is one less thing they need to add to their weekly budget. Our states share the blame for leaving the Feds. use of our tax money to help them take over our lives, thinking they are doing all of us a favor. Not true, we citizens need to cover the cost of our Life Style we have chosen and the government should take care of keeping our country safe, not individuals that live a life of no cares and rely on handouts. So, Mr. Romney and his family would be my choice because he and his family going back many years have earned their way of life and I find that type of personal/family background is what we need NOW!

October 29, 2012 at 10:07 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree 10/29 we all need to stay withing our budget. Our school districts now show the type of families living in their school district. Do they care about the burden the taxes have placed on the lower end of the salary scale? Are you kidding, most of those on the School Board have children that are out of the schools within the District and are now trying to improve on the system that was OK when their children attended the school. Why? Because the neighboring school districts have more haves than have nots. We are in need of a President that believes each state should take care of its citizens in all ways and taxation should reflect that decision. Stop stirring the pot when it only needs better parent/teacher communication. Go Romney!

October 30, 2012 at 2:34 PM 
Blogger Ernie of Cherry St. said...

Reform how school taxes are levied, if you want to have fairness.

October 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ernie, do you mean Act 1776? Also, think of what will happen if all the Military Budgets are cut, you will see layoffs that will take you back to pre WWII and the 1950s. Go Romney! Increase spending on the military to bring our Navy up to date and enact Act 1776 for our Schools sake and we locals that are footing the bill.

November 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The President made a showing in NJ. Big WOOPS! - That is part of his job, although it was wedged between his campaign stops - it did look good on TV. Our new President may not be exactly like this President - he may not have a Gas A__ and the Presidential Air Craft may be able to have a tune-up and the crew a rest. Hopefully this will be the case as we were discussing at dinner where we are of equal when it comes to Dems./Repubs. We prefer he stay in Washington and act like our President, not as a person that is trying for a position that he is not quite qualified for. More thought should be in what is good for our country and not what makes him look good. This has been my problem with this administration. So, his actions and his wife's actions which make them appear as a true Southerner, but with high hopes of becoming a "Blue" Blood, but the inability of crossing the line. A garden - great back during WWII, Laundry hanging in the White House - no, not too cool and also the good night family style, which seems to be a little edgy. It is all in appearance and that really does count. No wonder we are in 7th place when it comes to World Powers. Vote for whom?

November 3, 2012 at 3:13 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd hire the american!

November 4, 2012 at 8:03 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We all were born "created equal" and so why are we now back to men telling women what they can or can not do with their bodies and of course not considering who caused the unwanted births in this country and letting "men" go scott free. You said born or "created equal" ???
the American is the correct vote.

November 5, 2012 at 8:42 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Voted during Lunch and guess what? I was the only person there to vote. This PM should be very busy if all working people are planning on voting. Maybe as in our family they used the absentee ballot. I sure hope so or we will have a big surprise tomorrow.

November 6, 2012 at 3:00 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well my man did not get the job. I believe he could have turned things around. A business man is what we need but a second term for a person that has tried to scramble everything good about our good old USA came out on top. My budget has our family short $50.00 - $100.00 short every week or month, depending on when a certain tax is due or health premium. Retirement is not for any person in our age bracket, but as long as we keep working, some younger person can stay at home and just hope his education was not a waste and this administration will forgive his loan or loan payments. Sorry! The Economy is not going to get better any time soon! Start planning on a larger garden and take on any job that is open around your neighborhood. Older people need help and usually pay more than the minimum and also tip!!!

November 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We watched the show on TV regarding the Depressed Time and the Dust Bowl.
I lived in the country during this period and we grew all our own food, our clothing was made by my mother, with the exception of three cotton dresses to wear to school and one for Sunday. My Father was a truck farmer and also worked on construction. My Mother worked at various homes where the people were willing to pay $3.00 a day to have her do all their household chores. In the summer we worked in our field and garden, plus picked tomatoes for three farmers. Now, we never saw anything wrong with our life style, but children today do not believe they should work until they are 18. Looking over the two candidates I decided Election Day we needed a Business Person to take over our country. Business sense is needed and since this Blog's entry is after the fact, the Election is over. I pray that the President will call on Romney and let him explain how business and running the country should work and get us out of the red...SORRY ECONOMY - WE MADE A BAD CHOICE AGAIN.

November 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11/20/12 Anonymous, I agree we do need a business person in the White House, but not one that places his values concerning abortion above the women's rights that truly need to have one. Religion has nothing to do with how our President is chosen and this also should not enter into his way of governing/thinking about the USA and the world as a whole. Making exceptions when it comes to those entering with out legal consent should be returned to their country and placed at the bottom of the list for re-entering. Presidential Privilege should be used sparingly and under no condition go against our constitution, we do not want another Dictator as we had in Europe. Dictating how we should eat, manage our health care, worship or the level of education all our children should have by using Federal Guidelines and Dollars should never be,let the states and local governments decide their needs. So, if some of the above is followed, we could get out of the RED a lot faster and the people in each state would welcome the BLACK INK.

November 23, 2012 at 9:10 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Listening to CNN talk shows and the President regarding exactly what the people want the government to do about getting out of the red and into the black. Our family did not vote for our present President because we wanted him and his followers to tax the rich. What we were suggesting not taxation but plugging the loop holes that only the rich like our President take advantage of because of the salary they command. I know if our family had the large amount they are talking about that most wealthy people use to invest we would do the same. So, why not tax (say 8%) every person the same on any income received, salary,serving on a Board, company stock received in place of a raise(changing each year depending on the stock market) or any other source. This whole taxation bit needs to be across the board so every person will feel the same pinch. I know there are quite a few wrinkles in this suggestion, but it really makes me sick when bosses pay no income tax on their salaries and purchase stock or are able to hide their profits on the untaxed income.

November 24, 2012 at 10:04 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanksgiving conversation regarding the qualification of both Presidential Candidates. Although we are in disagreement over why each of these candidates were chosen in the first place, we know which party got us into the RED and that the present commanding party got us deeper into the RED within three years. So, now what? Does he, Obama, have a great plan to get us into the black? No, only to tax the rich, that keep the middle class employed, and not one thing said about loop holes as 11/24 suggested. In one year if the present administration is unable to justify their spending habits and inability to create jobs we should kick them out of office and start from scratch with a Zero Base Budget Plan (over the cliff). Cut the number in congress and wages across the board. Did you say a few wrinkles would be needed to adjust our government's spending, yes! Another thing we discussed and that was why this President is unable to use the telephones but uses Air Force 1 with all the guardian angels watching his every move, making a simple conference phone conversation less expensive and keeping him where the work for our country is supposed to take place which is in Washington. The correct phone is in Washington if we are deeply in trouble - RED PHONE. The agreement is that this President needs to get with the program of government and stop playing around when mistakes are made and be held accountable not as it is now, every person in his cabinet is looked at first.

November 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We made a mistake again! It looks like our President thinks Chicago Style of governing is the correct way- give them money for doing nothing and hope for the best. His way is the right way. Don't read anything that is suggested by an opponent to make life here in the USA more affordable - just keep on spending.

December 3, 2012 at 2:56 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How is it that if you make it in America and are able to use all loop holes in order to keep your hard earned money plus interest you are now looked down on not up to. Money in the bank for the medium earners and stock and bonds for the richer earners. That is the way it is. Never play with the stock market because you think you can not go broke - you can. The crying now by the middle/upper class found that out when 9/11 and the housing market fell apart. So, who would you believe when it came to finances and security of our country? We did make a mistake again is correct. While Rome is burning our President is playing a fiddle. A need to get his mind in motion rather than his mouth. How we are handling at home and abroad problems is like our computer - caught in a loop. Round and Round we go one cover up after another. Please have members of the President's family talk to him and suggest just maybe he should stop and listen to people from the outside of his inter circle.

December 4, 2012 at 10:40 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Almost there Mr. President...Over the Cliff that is. Across the board cuts is what he wants people, that way he will not go down in history as being the President that caused the down fall of the Good Old USA. He is not a decision maker but is a lot of puff or a great carnival act. We certainly did make a mistake not listening Romney and facing issues straight ahead. Less spending & Less Government in our lives is needed. I voted for the correct man, sorry too many people decided on the hand-out candidate.

December 5, 2012 at 7:57 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Out for dinner with my professionals that think they know best, but this time we agreed on one big item concerning our President... Over the Cliff was his intent to begin with after the election. You are correct 12/5 he is not a decision maker. I too made the correct choice.

December 6, 2012 at 6:28 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obama won the correct amount of states with the correct amount of popular votes that would give him 4 more years to spend our money. Now, we hear he is looking for an Ambassador to Ireland and was thinking on the line of Wm. Clinton a former President. His wife wants to get out of government so why not assign Bill to this position - he has always had his way with women and blarney too - his wife would be able to help him check out the landscape. Hillary is not interested in becoming Gov. of NY or President so the Democrats need to put their thinking hats on for all the replacements that will need to be filled in January 2013. Bill and Hillary will be out of the way and Chicago has a few Democrats that would like to help out with the Deficit, you know Chicago Style!!! It would be great to have a recount and find an error was made in Nov.

December 8, 2012 at 3:16 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Both Parties selected the wrong people to run for the highest office in the USA. Mr. Bush,a former Gov. of Texas, did not ask for 9/11 and the advise given him by the people that actually thought they knew what they were doing and convinced the UN and our Congress that "War" was the answer got us into this situation. Mr. Obama, convinced the Democrats that he with his ability to speak on any subject, would be the best person, with his knowledge as a short term Sen. from IL and the Chicago way of running their state would be the best for the USA. We now know the Chicago way is not correct, NY Federal Reserve Adviser did not and does not know all the answers and as for the War, don't count on too many Troops coming home soon. Afgans. are comfortable with the way they are now and exactly why would they take over the security of their country when we in the last three years have expressed our concern so loudly that they believe we will stay until the end of time. Wrong Person selected and elected. Stop, Look & Listen should be the words our present President needs to abide by NOW because we are out of money and out of NEW TROOPS that want to protect another country that is not willing to try harder to secure their borders.

December 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bush started two illegal oil wars and never found any WMD's. He also mislead the public about the $ spent by not including the wars' costs in the operating budget. He took a surplus from Clinton and ran the country into the ground. From the subprime mortgage failures to the wars, along with Halliburton's no-bid contracts that killed soldiers that took showers over in Iraq and Afghanistan by electrocution, Bush was the worst chicken-hawk president that we ever had.

December 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

" Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd hire the american!

November 4, 2012 8:03 AM"

Funny, very funny. Now, knowing that McCain was born overseas, and not in Hawaii like President Obama was (I saw the Hawaii newspaper announcement), and knowing that Romney's family was living in Mexico at one time, I guess Obama is the only American.

January 10, 2013 at 6:42 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Joe Scarborough sat down with a panel on Meet The Press Sunday and said the only reason Republicans maintained control over the house in the 2012 election was gerrymandering. “It was just gerrymandering from 2010 that gave us the majority,” he said.

Scarborough admitted that he had made a “mistake” the past month talking about how Republicans had won a majority of the House. He also said that what Americans want more than compromise, at this moment, is a “vision” for the Republican party. “The vision that Republicans have to speak to the middle class concerns,” he said.

He noted it wasn’t “just about the debt” even though that was the issue that mattered to him most, personally and said the Republican party has been getting “smaller and smaller and smaller.”

“In this debate,” Scarborough said, “we actually have conservative thinkers, talking about Ronald Reagan being a rhino, a Republican in name only, because he supported an assault weapons ban. They keep pushing themselves closer and closer to the cliff.”

January 20, 2013 at 3:22 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home